Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
- Seyed Masoud Tayefeh Cheraghali 1
- Amin Sarang 1
- Mohammad Ali Zahed 2
- Hossein Vahidi 3
- Moazameh Akbari 4
1 Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, P.O.Box 14155-6135, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States of America.
3 Department of Industrial Ecology, Academic Center of Education, Culture and Research(ACECR),Sharif University Branch, Tehran, Iran.
4 Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Iran.
Abstract
One of the main problems in the quality control of rivers is the high control cost imposed upon pollutant units. The cooperative policy approach in the treatment process between two or more pollutant units is a new and economic perspective in the environmental management of catchment basins. Origins of large amounts pollutants which require a high cost to control pollution are trying to start partnerships with smaller units in establishing joint refineries in order to reduce their own and the whole system's costs. In this study, considering the one way direction of the river's water, the Streeter – Phelps equations were used to simulate the river. The Ant Colony Optimization was used as an efficiency model in order to acquire the best scenario of cooperation based on the maximum elimination of pollution and reduction of treatment costs without straying from the river's quality standards. Also the ratio – trade system was used for commercial purposes. After this the cost of the depleting units was split evenly between them using the cooperative game theory. The efficiency of the model was evaluated by qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Zarjub River in Gilan province of Iran. Three main scenarios were taken to mind for cooperative trading to take place. Carrying out the trade – partnership model could play positively large role in sufficing the quality the control of river water.
Keywords
Broekx C. J., Vandenberghe S., Sels V., Maynaets H., Vercaemt E., euntjens P., Hulle S. V., Wustenberghs H., Bauwens W., Huygens M., Coupling a hydrological water quality model and an economic optimization model to set up a cost – effective emission reduction scenario for nitrogen, Environmental Modelling & Software 26 (2011) 44–51.
Daylami A., Shamsai A. and Niksokhan M. H., A cooperative approach for waste load management in rivers, WFL Publisher, Science and Technology, Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment (2011).
Dorigo M., and Stutzle T., Ant Colony Optimization, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, QA402.5.D64 (2004).
Eheart J.W., Ng T.L., Role of Effluent Permit Trading in Total Maximum Daily Load Programs: Overview and Uncertainty and Reliably Implications, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE 130 (2004) 615–621.
Ferguson, T.S, Game Theory, UCLA (2008).
Guo P., Tanaka H., Dual Models for Possibility Regression Analysis, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 (2006) 253 – 266.
Hunga M., and Shaw D., A Trading-ratio System for Trading Water Pollution Discharge Permits, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (2005) 83–102.
Karmakar S., and Mujumdar P. P., An Inexact Optimization Approach for River Water Quality Management, Journal of Environmental Management 81 (2006) 233–248.
Mesbah, et al. [2006], Developing a Fuzzy-based Model for Water Quality Trading in River Systems, University of Tehran (Persian, with English abstract).
Niksokhan M.H., Kerachian R., and Karamouz M., A Game Theoretic Approach for Trading Discharge Permits in Rivers, Journal of Water Science Techno 60 (2009) 793-804.
Sarang A., and Lence B. J., and Shamsai A., Multiple Interactive Pollutants in Water Quality Trading, Environmental Management 42 (2008) 620-646.
Streeter H.W., Phelps E.B., A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River, Ш Factors concerning the phenomena of oxidation and reareation, Public Health Bulletin, Public Health Service Washington DC No. 146 (1925).